The School of Business & Economics has used a course embedded system of assessment, enhanced by nationally normed tests and indirect methods using exit and stakeholder surveys.
The graduate and undergraduate program learning outcomes are as follows:
The School of Business & Economics has used a course embedded system of assessment, enhanced by nationally normed tests and indirect methods using exit and stakeholder surveys.
The graduate and undergraduate program learning outcomes are as follows:
The system uses mostly direct assessment as indicated above with some nationally normed ETS Field tests and some course embedded assessment. Some indirect assessment measures are still reviewed, such as alumni surveys, employer surveys, faculty surveys, and student exit surveys on an annual basis. Most assessment exercises are given each semester and reviewed by external reviewers, i.e. faculty that did not teach the course and in some cases, members of the business community.
The Assessment Center does skill-based assessment each semester on the basis of 12 different competencies. These competencies have been identified as being highly sought by employers as well as important to academic success. These competencies are encompassed into the following categories:
|
|
These competencies are evaluated using seven exercises: case analysis, in basket exercise, client role play, coaching role play, supervisory role play, presentation and leaderless group discussion. Students complete the Assessment Center in their freshman year and in their senior year while enrolled in X220 and X410. Assessments are done each semester. This year the School will be integrating the skill-based results from the Assessment Center into its data base of knowledge-based assessment.
The tables below include each Learning Outcome, Learning Objectives associated with that Outcome for the School of Business and Economics Undergraduate program, and the assessment tools and timetables to be used for measuring each objective.
Outcome #1 - Teamwork: Students will use teamwork skills to participate effectively in team problem-solving and decision-making situations. | |||
Learning Objective | Name of | Description of Assessment Tool | Date of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome #2 -Leadership: Students will use leadership skills to participate effectively in individual and team problem-solving and decision-making situations. | |||
Learning Objective | Name of | Description of Assessment Tool | Date of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome #3 - Technology: Students will be able to use word-processing, spreadsheet, database, and collaborative software and worldwide web tools and apply them to analysis of business decision situations. | |||
Learning Objective | Name of Assessment Tool | Description of Assessment Tool | Date of Administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome #4 - Communication: Students will be able to communicate interpersonally in order to establish positive business relationships, and to logically and effectively construct and deliver business presentations in oral and written formats, utilizing a variety of presentation tools and media. | |||
Learning Objective | Name of | Description of Assessment Tool | Date/place of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome #5 - Functional Knowledge: Students will know the core concepts of each business discipline – accounting, finance, information systems, management, and marketing. | |||
Learning Objective | Name of | Description of Assessment Tool | Date of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome #6 - Ethics: Students will be able to identify ethical issues in business situations and propose effective approaches to their resolution. | |||
Learning Objective | Name of | Description of Assessment Tool | Date of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome #7 - Global and Diverse Perspectives: Students will be able to identify multicultural and diversity issues in business situations and evaluate their impact. | |||
Learning Objective | Name of | Description of Assessment Tool | Date of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome #8 - Critical, Analytical and Integrative Thinking: Students will be able to analyze business problem situations systematically and effectively, and apply knowledge from multiple disciplines to the problem. | |||
Learning Objective | Name of | Description of Assessment Tool | Date of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The data concerning the distribution of students for each course at the level of novice, competent and accomplished is feed into the data base and compiled for each learning outcome.
The assurance of learning process can be charted as follows:
Assurance of Learning Table with Timelines | |||
Activity | Agency | Time Due | Report |
Faculty Retreat on Assessment to prepare faculty | Assessment Chair | October 19 | Dean |
Pilot Business Core Exam | Z302 Professor | November 30 | Assessment Chair |
Implement Program | Assessment Committee | January 2008 | Dean and Faculty |
Notify Faculty - Assessment Exercise | Assessment Committee Chair | January 15. | Check on Ethics – Course outline |
Select evaluation team | Assessment Committee | February 15 | Assessment Committee |
Activity | Agency | Time Due | Report |
Appoint Team | Assessment Committee | January 20 | Assessment Committee |
Decide on quantitative standard for strengths and weaknesses | Assessment Committee | January 30 | Coordinate with Faculty |
Collect evaluation team decisions | Assessment Chair | Due by date classes end | Report to Assessment Committee |
Feed data into data base | Data entry person | January/ May | Notify Assessment Chair data has been entered. |
Analyze data | Assessment Committee | March/ June | Notify Assessment Chair |
Prepare Annual Report highlighting strengths and weaknesses | Apply standard to results and suggest possible actions. Assessment Committee | February | Report - Dean and Faculty at faculty meeting in February |
Make Decisions on changes | Faculty Meeting | March | Dean |
Implement Changes | Dean and Faculty Committees | August | Committee notify the Dean and faculty |
Measure results of changes | Done as part of next assessment cycle | Each semester | Assessment Committee |
Make decisions on the effectiveness of changes | Dean and Faculty | Two year cycle | Dean and faculty |